I challenged the core logic of a staking platform and reshaped its architecture to support 15+ networks

The more networks the platform supported, the less reliable the experience became. The problem wasn’t that staking was inherently complex. It was that the product was structured in a way that made complexity harder to handle:

• No shared mental model across networks

• Account-first structure fragmenting the system view

• Limited portfolio visibility across accounts and networks

Ultimately, the Control Centre wasn’t built to support multi-network staking at scale. That meant every new network added more friction, more adaptation, and less clarity for the user.

An incremental approach - improving the existing account-focused structure by reducing the number of modals and organizing data into a clearer table-based layout.

Shifting from account-level to network-level - fundamental shift to a network-based architecture - even though it required users to adjust their mental model, it created much clearer system visibility.

/* Dashboard */

The dashboard shifts the product from fragmented account-by-account monitoring to a clearer cross-network view. It gives users a consolidated picture of stake metrics, recent actions, and positions in progress — reducing the visibility gaps that made the system harder to operate at scale.

/* Staking */

Staking as a core flow of Pier Two Control Centre puts users' assets to work to earn rewards. It's fully network-first: select a network, connect and link a wallet, then choose an amount to stake. The step-by-step, modal-free structure keeps things transparent and lets engineers freely add or remove fields per network, something previously hard to do.